Tag Archives: martial law

The Comedic Wit of Gen. Prayuth Janocha, Paramount Leader of Thailand’s Military Junta

Prayuth at press conference 071814

by Marque A. Rome

Good Lord! Who’d ever have thought it? Gen Prayuth Janocha: dictator of Thailand and closet comic. It’s no concoction of my imaginings, it’s the simple unvarnished truth. Any who tar Prayuth as a power hungry, megalomaniac need to watch a few of his news conferences (here is one).

Oh, I know, when he declared martial law, and then again, a few days later, in announcing the military takeover, he appeared rather wooden. ‘Rather wooden’ — nah, let’s be frank, he had no more personality than an automatic answering service. “To escape this message, press 9.”

No, no, no! It was stage fright. Prayuth is special among public speakers in performing better without a script.

His brand of humour, however, relies on droll, laconic delivery and a stance derived from ‘nak leng’ or mafiosi — like Marlon Brando’s character in “The Godfather”. Owing to his position, and the dramatic circumstances under which it was achieved, hearers (especially those politically opposed to his regime) take him at his word and think the dull menace of his expression seriously reflects his character.

Stuff and nonsense, I say! Beneath the Darth Vader-like visage beats the heart of a stand-up comic. Far from trying to instill fear, Prayuth, I am confident, is bent on leaving his auditors in stitches. Of course, it would spoil the act if he let on that his target is really laughter. He is, anyway, obviously a past master of this type of humour and so never drops out of character.

Those inclined to see murder and mayhem in his every nod and wink, however, walk away in fear.

But, enough of mere assertion: let us assay the facts and see whether the actions of Prayuth and his backers amount to anything more sinister than a good joke.

As those who have lived in such interesting times and places attest, proclamation of martial law by the generals means soldiers will soon be going house-to-house in search of opponents and slaying or arresting any who interfere. The life of the people changes dramatically. Any caught outside without proper papers face summary justice. Business slows down, schools close, tourism vanishes. People might grumble about issues more pressing than the quality of available beer — but that they know grumbling is dangerous and so refrain.

Martial Law in most places -- but peace in the USIn most places, this is what martial law looks like.

When martial law co-incides with seizure of the state, it looks like the sack of Rome: armed military presence is everywhere; buildings are peppered with bullet holes; scions of the leading families are hauled from their beds and shot in the street; the women moan, sirens wail, military transports crowd the roads and lines of refugees laden with what remains of formerly flourishing households straggle whither they know not — but away, away, away!

Now, answer me honestly, does the scene in Thailand have even a remote resemblance to the above?

Hardly. People are too busy applauding the soldiers for clearing the beaches, going after encroachers on National Park lands, and paying farmers their arrears. Here in Phuket, personally I have yet to see any soldiers, though certainly I’ve read of their doings.

As a case in point, take the beach clean-up: like JC driving the moneylenders from their temple stalls, a team of 14 police and soldiers have driven Phuket’s myriad beach vendors off our strands and into search for other forms of employment.

That’s right, 14 people. They had plenty of help. At Ao Por, for example, local villagers, together with police and soldiers under the direction of tambon Pa Klok administrative organisation chief Panya Sampaorat, tore down their own structures. Ao Por is Phuket’s principal tourist vessel port on the east coast, whence excursions by the hundreds embark for the other-worldly landscapes of Phang-nga Bay. The beach-side businesses, many built right on the narrow strand, were deeply entrenched in the community and of long-standing.

Patong before clean-up edPatong before the coup.

One might expect locals to protest their destruction; or, if too afraid of consequences to show opposition, to display a sullen reluctance to smashing their own rice bowls. Instead, they embraced the concept with enthusiasm and cleared the beach for the first time in over twenty years. Something similar happened at Patong beach, where vendors were even more deeply entrenched and where more money was at stake. For the first time since the mid-’80s, Patong beach is clear of sun-beds.

Patong after edPatong after.

Local authorities, though well aware beach vendor activities were illegal, chose to ignore them. I was at a Phuket Tourism Business Association meeting in the mid-nineties, called as a result of jet-ski operator depredations, which were then causing quite a stir in the press. The police representative said quite frankly: “You want me to order my men to drive jet-ski vendors off the beach because the boats are illegal. Fine. But I won’t do it until you find something else for those people to do. It is otherwise too dangerous. So either find operators an alternative livelihood or make their boats legal.”

Eventually, rather than face fury from the operators and their employees, the government legalised their boats. The same has been done over the years to accommodate a plethora of encroachers — many, as with the so-called ‘beach club’ operators, with businesses promoting social and cultural degeneracy.

But Gen. Prayuth and his associates have, to the wonder of all, cut through the red tape. A considerable amount of public property is now clear of encroachers. They are doing it, moreover, with active support from the very people being driven away. It’s miraculous, and a gag even JC couldn’t pull off, for, as you perhaps recall, he was arrested and crucified after ridding the temple of its vendors.

I’ve a feeling, though, Prayuth is just a little to smart for much of his audience. Some people, notably those abroad, can’t bring themselves to laugh. Since 2009, Travel + Leisure Magazine ranked Bangkok as the world’s no. 1 city for tourism. This year, however, Bangkok didn’t make the Top 10. The editors put stuffy Kyoto first. even the dour Spaniards of Seville were awarded a higher rung than the free-wheelers of Bangkok.

Top 10 tourist destinations 2014 edBangkok is off Travel + Leisure’s list.

What changed? Certainly not Bangkok, where the eight-month long protests that tore the Shinawatras from their stranglehold on power were mounted as entertainment. I hardly think the proverbially serious Japanese and Spaniards have changed. What changed was the government in Bangkok, and with it U.S. policy towards Thailand. Travel + Leisure is published by Time, Inc., a major cheerleader of American policy initiatives, however insane. The U.S. rather publicly has snubbed the junta, and demanded the military hand over to civilian, democratically elected government.

As it happens, Thaksin Shinawatra long ago retained American lawyer Robert Amsterdam to handle his public relations abroad. Amsterdam is the very embodiment of what are sometimes termed ‘shyster lawyers’. He is not funny. He is scary, but astonishingly influential. He has, for example, raised Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom from virtual death, after the latter’s arrest by U.S. Gestapo for copyright infringement.

Robert AmsterdamRobert Amsterdam.

Thaksin is getting his money’s worth from Amsterdam: Bangkok no longer rates as fun city and the U.S. Embassy in Bangkok didn’t invite the country’s new administrators to dinner on the 4th of July, U.S. independence day. Whether Prayuth realises it or not, Amsterdam is his nemesis, and thus far it is Amsterdam who is winning the public relations war.

I think this result is largely owing to language. Personally, there’s no doubt in my mind as to whom I would rather sit down and chat with over dinner: Prayuth, with his dry wit, wins hands down. Amsterdam is pushy, strident, and constipated. Moreover, I expect he has bad breath. Dinner with him would be torture, I am nearly certain.

But the world listens because, whatever his other failings, he is an accomplished speaker of English, whereas Prayuth is at his best speaking in Thai off the cuff. A different perception — one more nearly consonant with how Thais themselves feel about the coup and what has ensued — might obtain if only Prayuth’s wit and wisdom could be translated into English.

But, alas for that. Wit is notoriously hard to translate. I could translate Bill Murray’s deadpan line, “I always like to say to people who want to be rich and famous, try being rich first — see if that doesn’t cover most of it,” but I doubt it would be taken as other than a sermon in Thai. No one would think it funny. Yet it is, brilliantly so.

Thus Prayuth, when he points out that, “People say I like to fight with the press, but I don’t like to fight with the press — whatever for?” is likely doomed to be misunderstood by those incapable of understanding the dry wit that informs his speech.

For those who do, though, trust me, he’s a breath of fresh air in a crowd where halitosis has been the norm.

Thailand’s Latest Putsch: Crisis End — Or Is It Only the Beginning

Malumbay si ina by Pablo Baens Santos ed

by Marque A. Rome

Evidently the other foot has fallen: Thailand’s military chief Gen. Prayuth Janocha declared martial law early this morning at 3.30 AM when much of the nation was asleep and people out and about were mostly unconcerned with politics or too drunk to care.

This does not come as a great surprise: last week the general’s official spokesman told Daily News, a mass circulation Thai language newspaper, that the general felt circumstances had grown worrisome and would declare martial law if he thought it the only way to keep events from entering a maelstrom.

As I write this, reports indicate police in Bangkok have been told the army would be responsible for security and to await orders. Soldiers over the last three months have reportedly erected some 178 bunkers around the sprawling city of 15 million (in Thailand, officially a province not merely a city). Traffic Chief Pol. Maj. Gen. Jirasant Kaewsaeng-ake said his office was “presently co-operating.”

Private TV channels, including that operated by the pro-government Red Shirts (UDD) and the Democrat Party’s anti-government Blue Sky TV, have been temporarily closed. A company of Guards from the 19th Regiment invested the premises of Thaicom, founded by Thaksin Shinawatra, which operates three satellites. Although Thaksin sold the company to Singapore sovereign fund Temasek in 2006, anti-government protesters believe the former prime minister is secretly still in control.

The big broadcast channels licensed by various arms of the government, including the army, are still on, but their programmes controlled. The army has issued a number of orders since taking over this morning, among which are that politically divisive expression is not allowed.

I did find what claims to be a live broadcast from the Red Shirt encampment at <www.asiaupdate.tv/live> on the Net. Nothing controversial has been said from the stage. The programme has so far been mostly live music — albeit nationalistic songs with a decidedly Red-Shirt bent: for example ‘Yingluck Must Fight’, about Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, forced from office by the Constitutional Court on 7th May. Although the army has commanded demonstrators stay put, the Red Shirt event did not appear to have thick attendance.

Red Shirt speaker 052014Red Shirt singer on stage after martial law declared Tuesday.

The stage backdrop features a slogan in English reading, “Fight for Democracy”. In Thai, however, is written “Suppress the Rebels!”, which evidently refers to the opposition People’s Democratic Reform Committee led by Suthep Thaugsuban.

Soldiers have organised inspection points around the city, which initially snarled traffic, but a report moments ago on Thai TV 3 showed that they have eased up on inspections and traffic appears to be moving normally now. At a news conference earlier this morning carried on the same station, Red Shirt chief Jatuporn Prompan said his group had no intention of interfering or opposing the army’s actions. He also said, in a report carried on the Daily News Website, that the Red Shirt encampment on Aksa Rd. had been “surrounded” by the army.

Jatuporn has hitherto proclaimed repeatedly that his group is willing to devote their “blood and sweat” to ensuring democracy in Thailand is not toppled. He also contends that moves to remove the present government (in caretaker status since December) result from a conspiracy of the old establishment against the policies, parties and governments associated with former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who was driven from office in a coup on 19 September, 2006, and is currently a fugitive, living abroad mostly in Dubai.

He is seen, however, as the real power behind the current Peua Thai Party government. Moves last year to cancel his conviction for abuse of power in a land deal, to return him to Thailand and restore the 46 billion baht seized by court order from his estate, prompted the campaign to topple his sister’s government beginning in October.

Army chief Prayuth said, after proclaiming martial law nation wide, that the order does not constitute a coup of state. However, seizing control of broadcast communications media and setting up road blocks reflect a strategy used in previous coups. The current acting prime minister, Niwatthamrong Boonsongpaisan, said he was not informed by the army in advance of the martial law decree. Daily News reports that he called an urgent meeting with cabinet ministers in a “secret safe house” to “evaluate the situation” and would call a news conference “later”.

The army announced also that a meeting of senior and regional commanders would be held today at 2.00 PM, and also called senior ministry and department civil servants”, including provincial governors, “to report in” at meetings scheduled for today. Members of the press were invited to a meeting at the Army Club on Vipawadi Rangsit Rd in Bangkok to hear details of martial law implementation.

At least two senior commanders, including Supreme Commander Gen. Thanasak ‘Big Jiab’ Pratimaprakorn, who yesterday went to Pakistan, will not attend. Thanasak, who is married to a member of the old establishment Bunnag clan, was earlier this year rumoured to be Suthep’s choice for a “neutral” prime minister.

Defence Ministry permanent secretary Gen. Nipat Tonglek also left yesterday, for a meeting of ASEAN defence ministers in Burma. He is due to return at 11.00 PM tonight. Nipat has been described in the press as former Prime Minister Yingluck’s chief ally in the military. He was also a member of CAPO (the centre to administer peace and order set up in January to administer the emergency decree issued then by the government). As part of today’s martial law decree, the army ordered CAPO disbanded.

Nothing divisive or incendiary is allowed printed, distributed or broadcast until martial law is repealed, an army announcement said. The law was invoked under articles 6 and 11 of the Martial Law Act of 2457 — a law enacted 100 years ago.

Article 6 of the Act affords “soldiers power superior to civil authorities” in administration of areas where the law is invoked. Article 11 details the activities forbidden during martial law. It is divided into eight sections forbidding unauthorised meetings, printed or broadcast materials and access to areas declared off limits, and allowing soldiers to order citizens to stay in situ, in their homes, and to declare a curfew. It also allows the defence minister to declare activities forbidden as he sees fit.

Article 4 of the act, however, states that martial law can be invoked by any commander down to the regimental level in the event of riots or warfare, and specifies no other case.

The latter point may lead to heated surmise regarding present circumstances, which, though indubitably a political crisis, and despite occasional clashes, shootings, and explosions, have not been reported as rioting or warfare.

Another point that may be germane regards who now is minister of Defence: according to the Ministry of Defence Website, Yingluck is still prime minister and defence minister, and Air Chief Marshal Sukampol Suwannathat is also defence minister. Sukampol, however, was removed from his position by Yingluck on 30th June, 2013, in response to a suit brought against him by former Democrat prime minister Abisit Vejjajiva. In so far as Gen Nipat is attending the Defence Ministers meeting in Burma, it may be assumed that for present purposes he is defence minister — and he has certainly not been seen as a friend to the protest movement.

Riot edWhen push comes to shove….

Many have waited, over the last six months, for the army to do something. Suthep and the PDRC openly demanded military intervention to protect democracy. On the opposite side, Thaksin has obviously tried to force Prayuth’s hand. The general, however, avoided intervention. When the State Enterprise Workers’ Relations Confederation, with members from some 20 state-operated companies, said they would strike beginning Thursday to support Suthep, and the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand union’s president also said his people would join the protests this week (though not strike) the “vacuum” that so many from every part of the political spectrum have been anticipating appeared at hand.

Whether that is what prompted the general to declare martial law can only be surmised. But its declaration undoubtedly must make many feel it is time to choose sides. Hitherto all sides have said they want ‘democracy’, though completely at odds about what that means. I expect that in the minds of Jatuporn, Thaksin and Suthep, this is the defining moment: henceforth, no room is left for fence-sitters.

Gen. Prayuth obviously hopes his move will end the gridlock and allow people to get back to their business. But is it the end? Or is it only the beginning….?